By William
Yaw Owusu
Tuesday,
October 31, 2017
The 13-member Prof Kwesi Botchwey Committee that
investigated the causes of the defeat of the then ruling National Democratic
Congress (NDC) in the 2016 general elections identified the obscene use of
money by party gurus as one of the causes.
The report says money had taken over the NDC, making
the party to go for the highest bidder.
The report, which is being kept like a state classified
document, posits, “The rise of moneycracy in the party generally was the NDC’s
undoing.”
According to the 65-page Executive Summary of the
report, the party’s ideology and philosophy had been ‘weakened’ by the influence of money and
that had brought in what it calls “waning of party ideology and philosophy
generally, leading to ethnicism and opportunistic attitudes to settler
communities in various constituencies.”
The report claims that there is also “the neglect of
the party’s democratic focus in policy-making.”
It continues, “The alienation of the party’s
‘natural’ social democratic allies – workers and their unions, farmers,
small-scale businessmen and women, traders, teachers, nurses, junior civil
servants, etc” was also a factor in the defeat.
It further says there was “inadequate recognition of
the demographic transition in our national population.”
According to the report, campaign funds used by the NDC
were misappropriated by party executives and candidates.
It underscores that some contributors the committee
members interacted with said the leadership of the party doled out huge sums of
money to support then President John Mahama’s re-election bid - which crashed
on December 7, 2016 - but the cash were pocketed by the party’s officials.
“Several contributors held the view that huge
amounts were channeled through the party’s executives and parliamentary
candidates who seemed to have pocketed or ‘edited’ moneys sent,” the 65-page
Executive Summary points out on Page 29.
The report, however, states that “except in few
cases, no executive admitted to receiving any monies from sources.”
“What seemed to be clear was that a large part of
campaign financing was done through channels other than the party’s regional or
constituency treasuries,” the report claims, giving an indication that most
funds came through the party’s headquarters and unusual channels.
The report reveals how the NDC parliamentary
candidates were receiving funds for their respective campaigns and how many NDC
party agents who supervised the December 7 election were still not paid for
work done.
“The team was informed that the parliamentary candidates
were sometimes invited to Accra to collect campaign money directly,” it says.
"At the time of the consultations, many polling
agents had still not been paid their allowances. Others complained that they
had been paid reduced amounts,” it adds.
Parlous
Finance
According to the report, the NDC’s finances were in a
precarious situation, although there was public perception that the then ruling
party was financially sound, judging by the flamboyant and profligate campaigns
displayed all over the country by President John Mahama.
“We found out
that the party’s finances are, contrary to popular belief, in a rather parlous
state,” the report reveals, adding, “We discuss the subject fully in the main
report and recommend that the party adhere strictly to the provisions of the
NDC Constitution and implement a dues-based regime of party financing that
would be sustainable and would moreover enable the party to stem the influence
of moneycracy in the conduct of the party’s affairs, as well as give the party
membership and the grassroots a sense of ownership and empowerment.”
The report says that on election day, there were
widespread transportation glitches, and that affected the NDC negatively.
According to it, Kofi Adams, the National Organizer,
had told the NDC campaign team that it (party) made adequate transport arrangements
but the problem was abused “by some unscrupulous party members who wanted to
profit from the process.”
It adds that Kofi Adams had indicated that “some
party members would board the buses from the party’s headquarters in Accra, get
off somewhere within Accra and then return to the party headquarters for more
allowances for transport.
“This, according to him (Kofi Adams), created the
congestion at the party headquarters and gave rise to the impression that there
was not adequate transport arrangement for the election.”
The committee asserts that it later found out that
“the reports of inadequate transport were not limited to the party headquarters
and therefore Greater Accra,” adding, “the rest of the regions had similar
concerns and these were made known to the committee.”
It underscores for instance, that “in some regions, the
complaints were particularly related to the non-decentralization of the transport
arrangements,” adding, “According to them, it was the national that sought to
arrange transport for the regions without the involvement of the regional party
officers, and this in their view, created a lot of bureaucratic bottlenecks in
the process and its attendant shortfalls.”