Nana Akufo-Addo leaves the court premises after proceedings
Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By William Yaw Owusu
Saturday February 16, 2013.
It has emerged that the total number of registered voters
abroad captured in the Biometric Voters Register (BVR) of the Electoral
Commission (EC) for the 2012 elections was 2,883 and not the over 241,000 as
earlier claimed.
This include diplomatic staff serving in Ghanaian missions
abroad, students on Ghana government scholarships, Ghanaian serving with
international bodies as well as Ghana service personnel returning from
international peacekeeping duties.
The total number of people registered abroad was
contained in the full list presented by the EC to the Supreme Court Registry on
Tuesday as part of the processes in a petition filed by three New Patriotic
Party (NPP) leaders including the party’s December 2012 Presidential Candidate
Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, challenging the commission’s declaration of John
Dramani Mahama as President. The other petitioners are Nana addo’s running mate, Dr. Mahamudu Bawumia and the party Chairman,
Jake Otanka Obetsebi-Lamptey.
The
Breakdown
In the document, the EC puts the number of service
personnel returning from international peacekeeping duties at 2178 while the
total number of diplomatic staff serving abroad as well as students on government
scholarships and Ghanaian serving with international bodies were 705.
This brings the total number to 2,883 leaving the EC
to fish for the missing 238,117.
For service personnel returning from international
peacekeeping duties, the EC said it registered 120 in the Volta Region, 92 in
Brong Ahafo, 210 in Northern Region, 216 in Western Region, 106 in Ashanti
Region and 1,434 in the Greater Accra.
The breakdown
of diplomatic staff serving abroad,
students on Ghana government scholarships, Ghanaian serving with international
bodies registered were as follows:
London, 49; The Hague, 27; Moscow, 34; Berlin, 27; Geneva, 26; Rome, 16; Spain,
3 (all in Europe); Cuba, 15; Washington DC, 23; New York, 55; Brazil, 13 (The
Americas).
The
rest are China, 20; Seoul, 22; India, 17; Dubai, 19; Malaysia, 13 (Asia), Addis
Ababa, 36; Pretoria, 43 (East & South Africa); Rabat, 45; Algiers, 28;
Cairo, 20 (North Africa); Monrovia, 27, Dakar, 21; Abidjan, 13; Bamako, 11;
Abuja, 30 and Lome, 7 (West Africa).
The EC’s submission was in
response to an order for interrogatories issued by the Supreme Court in respect
of the petitioners request to get the commission to furnish them with the
documents on the people registered overseas.
The petitioners said
the application for interrogatories was filed because of the answer given by
the EC after the petition had been filed.
The EC in answer
to the petition had submitted that over 200,000 votes from categories of voters
registered abroad were included in the final results of the election.
Simple calculation on the list of
voters registered abroad showed that the total number submitted by the EC was 2,883,
whereas the commission in response to the petition quoted that over 241,000
people were registered abroad.
The 241,000 Argument
The issue of 241,000 came about
as a result of the total number of registered voters quoted by EC Chairman Dr.
Kwadwo Afari-Gyan when he declared the results of the Presidential Election on
December 9, 2012.
On that day, he said that 14,158,890 was the total number of
registered voters with 11,246,982 valid votes cast at a 79.43 turnout even
though the petitioners averred that the commission had announced 13,
917,366 as the total number of registered voters prior to the election.
The petitioners in their petition
filed on December 28 raised the discrepancy in the total number of registered
voters announced by the EC and the commission in its answer filed on January 7,
2013, said that the discrepancy in figures rather affected voter turnout and
not the ballots obtained by each candidate.
EC’s Answer
The affidavit sworn to by Kwadwo Sarfo-Kantanka, a
deputy Commissioner of EC averred that the total number of registered voters
copies of which were forwarded to the parties was 14,031,680 and added that
figure14,158,890 used to declare the results was a ‘genuine’ error but that had
no bearing on the results declared.
Dr. Afari-Gyan and his deputy Kwadwo Sarfo-Kantanka
The commission said it rather affected the voter
turnout by increasing it to 80.15 percent from79.43 percent and not the actual
results released.
Not satisfied with the explanation the petitioners
asked the court to order the commission to submit the list diplomatic staff
serving abroad, students on Ghana government scholarships, Ghanaian serving
with international bodies as well as Ghana service personnel returning from
international peacekeeping duties with their bio-data as captured in the
register.
The figures submitted is far
lower than the figures the commission included in the declaration of the
results of the general election.
The details submitted to the
court included name, sex, age of the voters as well as location registered and
the polling station numbers but there were no voters ID numbers.
Another request from the
petitioners for the EC to explain why it failed to notify the petitioners’
party about the registration abroad so it could send representatives to monitor
the process was met with an aggressive answer.
“The 2nd respondent is not obliged by law
to allow political party representatives to be present during registration
exercise but done so, in practice, as a courtesy and to enhance transparency.
It was open to the political parties to have their representatives present at
the registration locations if they had so wished,” the EC charged.
EC
Responds To Interrogatories
Amadu Sulley, EC deputy
Chairman in charge of Finance and Administration who deposed to the affidavit
responding to the interrogatories averred that before the abroad registration,
it had given the NPP and the National Democratic Congress (NDC) the list of
foreign service personnel, their dependents, students on Ghana government
scholarships abroad and Ghanaians working with international organizations as
well as their locations and proposed dates of registration.
“Honourable Dr. Matthew Opoku Prempeh (NPP) and Mr George Lawson (NDC) collected the material on behalf of their political parties in the middle of September, 2012,” the EC declared, adding that, “no voting took place outside Ghana.”
“Honourable Dr. Matthew Opoku Prempeh (NPP) and Mr George Lawson (NDC) collected the material on behalf of their political parties in the middle of September, 2012,” the EC declared, adding that, “no voting took place outside Ghana.”
He also said that “Further directives received from the Court are yet to be
incorporated into the Register, as will the recent registrations effected in the
Kassena-Nankana District following the Order of the High Court.”
He averred that if that is done “This will alter the total number of
registered voters. The Voters Register is dynamic, not static, particularly in
this era of continuous registration as required by Regulation 9 of (C.I. 72).”
Explaining how the voter population increased from 13, 917,366 to 14,158,890 on the day of the declaration, the EC said “The said entries also included insertions, at 400 registration
centres and the Commission's District Offices, of the names of persons who
claimed to have voter ID cards but had been inadvertently omitted, as well as
data recovered from damaged registration machines and back-up pen drives.”
The
EC insisted that once the petitioners did not mention that the 14,158,890
registered voters represented the raw entries in the registration database,
that ‘omission’ has resulted in the creation of ‘distortions’.
Mahama Factor
In President Mahama’s
answer to the petition, he endorsed the EC’s explanation that the 13, 917,366 figures given to the political parties was
provisional.
President Mahama was sworn in on January 7
“The 1st
respondent states that to the best of his knowledge and belief, the figure of 13, 917,366 announced by the 2nd respondent
was clearly provisional,” Elvis Afriyie Ankrah who was the President’s campaign
coordinator averred on his behalf.
“At the time of the
announcement, 2nd respondent had not registered prisoners and other
voters including those in the diplomatic missions abroad and on peacekeeping
missions, and had also not done mop up exercise that it undertook
subsequently,” he said.
“The suggestion by
petitioners that there were some veiled reasons for the difference between 13, 917,366 and the final number of registered voters
is without basis and smacks of utmost bad faith,” he added.
No comments:
Post a Comment