Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By
William Yaw Owusu & Rita Oduro
Tuesday, June 10, 2014
Former First Lady Nana Konadu Agyemang Rawlings
yesterday, appeared before the Commission of Enquiry investigating the payments
of judgement debts to testify in the case in which her company was given $4,150,
27.50 as judgement debt.
She confirmed the payment to Calf Cocoa
International which is partly owned by Carridem Development Company Limited,
the investment wing of the 31st December Women Movement (DWM) where
she is the president and China International Corporation Company but insisted
that the amount paid was in Cedis and not dollars.
Tony Lithur who had represented Calf Cocoa in court
had told Sole Commission that he secured $4.15m for the company because the
government at the time refused to release about $2.6million to Calf Cocoa for
its operations.
Interestingly Nana Konadu went to the commission
with a different lawyer outside Tony Lithur who secured the judgement debt for
her.
Testimony
When the case titled: ‘The CEO, Calf Cocoa
International versus the Attorney General’ was called yesterday Mrs. Rawlings
mounted the witness’s box alongside her lawyer, George Bernard Shaw.
She told Sole-Commissioner Justice Yaw Apau of the
Court of Appeal that Carridem decided to go into the manufacturing of cocoa and
subsequently got assistance from the government of China.
She said Calf Cocoa was then given concessionary
loan by the Chinese adding “So we started Calf Cocoa in 1996 or 1997, acquiring
the land and everything. The shareholding was 49 percent for my organization
and 51 percent for the Chinese company brought to us by their government.”
“We acquired this concessionary loan and we were
supposed to take it in bits. Whenever we needed funds for the project we wrote
to the Ministry of Finance and they gave us the amount that was requested for,”
she said.
The
Problem
Nana Konadu said “sometime in 2002 ending, we wrote
to the ministry informing them that we had completed everything and we would
like to start the project in 2003. It was at that time that we started having
problems of who owned the company.”
She said “politics unfortunately came to play in
this project and it was difficult to get the money. From 2003 when we were
supposed to have started manufacturing cocoa powder, cocoa cake and cocoa
butter, it was impossible to start.”
She said when things got out of hand “the Chinese
sort of pulled out because they said there was too much political interference,”
adding “we decided to go to court to fight the case in 2005 and judgement was
delivered in 2008.”
According to the former First Lady, the government
went on appeal but lost against Calf Cocoa and in 2009 “we could actually go to
the premises again.”
She said in the process, facilities in the company
deteriorated and water and electricity disconnected, making refurbishment of
the place very expensive.
Sabotage
Dometi Kofi Sorkpor, counsel for the commission asked
Nana Konadu if it was “this unnecessary interference” from the government resulted
the truncation of the project and she said “absolutely, it has been so.”
“From 2002 when the problem started, it has not
stopped. It carried through to the new government of 2009 and it is carrying
through in the government of today. I don’t know whether they really want to
let this place function so that we can employ the 2800 people that this factory
can employ.”
Justice Apau also enquired from her what was stopping
the Chinese from continuing with the project since judgement had already been
obtained and she replied that “they have given us option to sell their shares.
I think they are not comfortable with what is going on.”
“We tried on a number of occasions to get certain
loans for the project but the banks have not been coming forth either. There
was a huge amount that they said was going to be given to companies in cocoa
production so we also applied to ADB. I know that some companies were given
$8million, $10million and so on but till date our document has not even been
processed.”
Mrs. Rawlings added that “we have a new business plan.
We are doing the ground works. Two companies we contacted say they want to wait
for the economy to get better before they can invest in the country.”
CP
Later, Oladele Kwaku Aribike from the Registrar General’s Department tendered in evidence, documents covering both Carl Plotner and Construction Pioneers (CP) which is at the centre of huge judgement debt payments.
Later, Oladele Kwaku Aribike from the Registrar General’s Department tendered in evidence, documents covering both Carl Plotner and Construction Pioneers (CP) which is at the centre of huge judgement debt payments.
Mandate
The ‘Commission of Enquiry into the
payment of Judgement Debt and Akin’ under C.I. 79 to investigate the frivolous
and dubious payments of huge monies to undeserving individuals and companies,
was appointed by President John Dramani Mahama after public uproar over the
payments in what has now come to be termed as Judgement Debts (JD).
Notable among them were payments made to CP (€94
million) and the never-ending case of GH¢51.2million parted to the self-styled
National Democratic Congress (NDC) financier, Alfred Agbesi Woyome, both of
which many believed were dubious and frivolous.
No comments:
Post a Comment