Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By
William Yaw Owusu
Tuesday, September 2, 2014
The second batch of people who put in claims to
collect huge sums in respect of the Volta Basin Flooded Area following the
construction of the Akosombo Dam in the 1960s were interrogated by the
Commission of Enquiry investigating the payment of judgement debts.
Witnesses appearing before the Sole-Commissioner
Justice Yaw Apau yesterday tendered in evidence site plans that did not have
dates embossed but had purportedly used the same documents to claim the amounts
from the Lands Commission.
Cabinet in July 2008 approved a consolidated amount
of compensation totaling GH¢138million for various stools/families in Pai,
Apaaso, Makango, Ahmandi and Kete Krachi Traditional Areas and about 57 groups were
said to have benefited from the amount.
However, Justice Apau expressed shock at how the
Lands Commission could have proceeded to order the release of the various
amounts to the claimants based on the documents the witnesses are tendering
before the commission.
Furthermore, the Court of Appeal judge did not
understand why communities that were resettled by the government in the 1960s,
given communal lands and paid compensation for crops destroyed by the Volta
River floods could turn around to claim cash compensation almost 50 years down
the land.
All the witnesses told the commission that one Nana
Asetena Mensah, a leader in the communities in Krachi, was the one who had
commissioned Kwadwo Ababio & Co, a consultant and surveyors to survey the submerged
area out of which the individual plotting were done.
Justice Apau has made it clear that Nana Asetena
Mensah never came forward to make any claims. Rather, he delegated the
Krachiwura who has no stake in the lands to lead the chase for compensation.
Yesterday, it was Kwame Ananey aka Twenebaoh Anane
Hastings, Head teacher at Gyanekrom DA Primary in the Volta Region who was
first to mount the witness’ box.
Dentewiase
He claimed secretary to the Dentewiase Clan which is
in the Krachi Traditional Area and said the land which is about 22,000 acres
belonged to the clan which covered six towns but the Sole-Commissioner revealed
that in reality the site plan had one Nana Kofi Gyantro II of Dentewia as the
beneficiary.
Mr. Ananey claimed he was selected by the family
elders to chase the money but admitted that he personally did not know the date
on which the site plan was submitted.
His counsel Kwame Yankyera, entered the fray and
insisted that “the plans were extracted from a larger mapping” and said there
were dates on the maps but the documents were not available.
Mr. Ananey then confirmed that he collected a total
of GH¢1.161,565.65 in five tranches between 2009 and May 2013.
He gave the breakdown as GH¢21,549.00 (2009),
GH¢16,716.09 (April, 2010), GH¢167,122.00 (July, 2010), GH¢373,376.85 (January
2012) as well as GH¢558,441.67 and GH¢24,320.03 in May 2013.
“The process was started by Nana Asetena Mensah. I came
in when he introduced Kwadwo Ababio & Co to us and my family elders selected
me to chase the compensation,” he said.
He said the six communities shared the amount received
equally regardless of the size of the acreage but Justice Apau said “ceding
parts of the lands to other villages meant that you didn’t know the actual size
of your land.”
“When your families were being resettled you were
not there but somebody come in 2005 to tell you that money is coming and you
quickly drew these plans for the claims and that is where the confusion is
coming from,” the judge retorted.
Dentemanso
Nana Kadewurra of Dentemanso who claims to be
Benkumhene of Chaichai Division in the Krachi Traditional Council also
testified.
He claimed that his clan owned 2,761.74 acres but
the document he presented indicated that the site plan which was extracted in
12005 was in his own name.
He said the family did not distribute the total of GH¢96,427.19
paid in five tranches among individuals but for development projects and could
only mention the construction of the chief’s palace as one of the development
projects.
He also admitted that they were resettled following
the floods.
Grubi
Nana Obuiman II aka Alex Adomabe of Grubi who said
he was the Nifahene of Chaichai in the Krachi Traditional was the next witness
and he admitted that his people were resettled following the floods.
He said the family selected him to chase the money but
the site plan he tendered in evidence was in his name, compelling Justice Apau
to remark that “they are all giving similar explanation.”
He said he collected GH¢70,785.26 but records at the
commission indicated that he GH¢83,157.22 was credited to his name.
Dindor
Nana Nsiahya II of Dindor in the Krachi Traditional
Area said he led his people to claim 696.98 acres and said they were not
resettled following the floods.
He also said they were not paid any compensation and
admitted that the site plan was in his name and used that position to collect
GH¢37,027.42 from the government in tranches.
Motodua
Nana Ofosu Okofrobour Appiah II of the Yaa-Dwori
Clan in Motodua who claimed to be Twafohene to Krachiwura also testified and
said they put in claim for 24,196.15 acres.
He presented a site plan that had the names of Nana
Kofi Fosu, Motodua Chief and Nana Ofosu Okofrobour Appiah and Dente Kwasi
Emmanuel as the owners of the land but said the land belonged to the clan.
He admitted collecting GH¢1,273,976.61 in five
tranches.
No comments:
Post a Comment