By William
Yaw Owusu
Monday January
29, 2018
The official report from the Attorney General’s Department
in the matter of some top officials of the Electoral Commission (EC) accused of
misappropriating GH¢480,177.87 of the staff Endowment Fund appears to indict
the Economic and Organised Crime Office (EOCO).
The report appears to indicate that the
investigations, which started sometime in July last year, were shoddily done.
As a result, the AG could not prefer a charge
against any of the suspects in the matter and instead called for further probe
into the matter.
AG’s
Opinion
The report clearly states in a 10-point opinion of
the AG’s Department that “The investigations have failed to show what happened
to staff contributions for the Endowment Fund for the period July to December
2013, to which contributions for March to October 2014 were applied.”
According to the report, the investigations did not
address the amounts of GH¢480,177.87 and GH¢354,016.57, which were applied to
the period July to December 2013.
It states, “EOCO’s investigations were restricted to
the GH¢480,177.87 which was reportedly missing, although it is apparent from
the docket that the matter goes beyond the investment for the period of March
to October 2014,” adding, “The evidence shows that as at 1st March
2014, the opening balance of the main account for the Commission stood at
GH¢131,499.82 out of which GH¢110,950.00 was transferred from the main account
into the operational account.”
The report further maintained, “The evidence further
showed that out of the transferred sum of GH¢110,950.00, GH¢86,730.00 was used
on activities of the EC and this expenditure is covered by the necessary
payment vouchers.
“There is also evidence from issued cheques that an
amount of GH¢25,134,591.29 was spent out of the operational account. The
supporting vouchers for this expenditure, however, have not been traced.”
The AG’s Department said, “In the light of the
foregoing, we are unable to establish whether or not any money has been dishonestly
appropriated. It is also difficult to determine the specific amount of money
which is lost or remains unaccountable.”
In coming to this conclusion, the AG explained that “There
has not been any proper audit of the Staff Endowment Fund,” adding that “A
draft audit on the docket concluded that the sum of GH¢480,177.87 (the
Endowment Fund contribution for the period of March to October 2014) was used
for operational activities of the EC, although there is no evidence to that
effect on the docket.
“We are of the view that until a comprehensive audit
is conducted into the Endowment Fund of the staff of the EC, it would be
difficult to firmly establish the commission of any malfeasance.”
The AG’s Department went ahead to recommend “a
comprehensive independent forensic audit of the staff Endowment Fund of the
commission to facilitate further investigations into the matter.”
Even in the EOCO’s own investigations, the focus was
clearly not on the three top officials it ordered to proceed on leave following
an official complaint from the EC chairperson, Mrs. Charlotte Osei.
Georgina Opoku-Amankwaah, Deputy Commissioner
in-charge of Finance and Administration; Kwaku Owusu Agyei-Larbi, Chief
Accountant and Dr Joseph Kwaku Asamoah, Finance Director, were hounded out of
office by the EOCO and their continuous stay out of office is beginning to
raise eyebrows since nothing was found against any of the three top officials
per EOCO’s own work.
The docket EOCO prepared on the matter and sent to
the AG’s Department for advice did not make the three officials suspects in the
case.
In fact, in the eight-page document sighted by DAILY
GUIDE, Mrs. Opoku Amankwaah and the two others were treated as
witnesses by the EOCO.
The title of the docket - ‘The Republic vrs Samuel
Yorke Aidoo and Ishmael Pensah’- captures Mrs. Osei as the officer who had
filed the complaint before the EOCO.
A source told DAILY
GUIDE that the AG’s Department would not have hesitated in preferring a
charge against any suspect if the EOCO investigators had been able to do a good
job.
In the opinion of the government’s legal advisor,
there should be a forensic audit to establish whether funds were indeed
misappropriated or not.
EOCO spent about seven months investigating the case.
No comments:
Post a Comment