By William
Yaw Owusu
Saturday
April 14, 2018
The immediate-past Microfinance and Small Loans
Centre (MASLOC) Chief Executive Officer (CEO) under the previous National
Democratic Congress (NDC) administration, who is being held responsible for
alleged financial malfeasance, has hit back at her accusers.
Sedina Tamakloe Attionu is threatening legal action
against all those commenting on an audit report that focused on her dealings at
MASLOC, because her lawyers say it’s defamatory.
According to a forensic audit report, Sedina
Tamakloe Ationu, an appointee of then President Mahama, allegedly withdrew
¢500,000 belonging to MASLOC and invested it in a private non-banking financial
institution called Obaatampa Microfinance but reportedly failed to pay back into
the stated accounts of MASLOC.
The report indicated that MASLOC invested the amount
in a 91-day fixed deposit with Obaatampa Microfinance Ltd at an interest rate
of 26% per annum in July 2014, but the former CEO allegedly wrote a letter on
August 28, 2014 instructing Obaatampa to terminate the investment and pay back
the amount.
It said that although there is evidence that the
amount was paid as directed by Sedina Tamakloe Ationu, there is however no
evidence of the amount having been paid back into the accounts of MASLOC.
"Mrs Sedina Tamakloe should be held responsible
for the refund of the amount of GH¢500,000 with interest in accordance with
regulations 61(5) of the Financial Management Act, 2003 (654),” the auditors
recommended.
According to the report, over GH¢2 million was
approved in 2016 for the implementation of sensitization programmes across the
country but that cannot be accounted for under Sedina Tamakloe Ationu.
The report said based on the budget, MASLOC planned
outreach programmes in all 10 regions in 2016 and a budget of GH¢1,706,000 was
approved by the then MASLOC Board at its 27th general meeting held
on April 26, 2016 for the implementation of those programmes.
Lawyers
Warning
However, Sedina Tamakloe Attionu’s lawyers have
fired back, warning that all those circulating the story might be sued for
defamation.
Her lead counsel, Victor K. Adawudu, in a statement
yesterday said “the said publication contains statements that are highly
defamatory of our client and calculated to ridicule her person in the eyes of
decent-thinking people and society as a whole.”
“It must be observed that sometime last year whilst
our client was overseas, an invitation letter from the Economic and Organised
Crime Office (EOCO) to her was reported in the media, and upon her return, she
honoured the said invitation with her lawyers and various allegations were made
against our client.”
According to the lawyers, “The said allegations were
denied by our client and she gave a statement to that effect to the investigative
agency (EOCO). It is our belief that EOCO, as the investigative body, is doing
its professional work within the ambit of the law.”
The statement said “we wish to state that whilst it
is the duty of the investigators to do their duty to gather evidence to
complete their work, a private auditing firm by name Baffour Awuah &
Associates wrote to our client to give them information and also respond to the
same issues that our client had responded to at EOCO.”
“We found the request from the said firm curious and
an attempt to elicit information from our client after the fact unacceptable.
Upon our advice, our client declined the said invitation to participate in this
private audit process.”
The lawyers said that “the process employed
confirmed our suspicion that the said audit firm was being used to do a hatchet
job as opposed to the professional work as dictated by ethics and the law
governing the profession.”
“It is our duty to state categorically that there is
no truth whatsoever in the purported publication being published in the media.
For the avoidance of doubt, our client has denied all allegations leveled
against her and we wish to reiterate that our client did not misappropriate any
funds of MASLOC during her tenure as Chief Executive Officer.”
“We have the instructions of our client to commence
legal action against all persons and corporate entities publishing these
defamatory statements about our client with the sole purpose to destroy her
hard-earned professional reputation built over her working life of over 25
years.”
No comments:
Post a Comment