Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By
William Yaw Owusu
Wednesday, November 19, 2014
There was drama at an Accra Financial Court yesterday
when a prosecution witness in the much-touted Ghana Youth Employment
and Entrepreneurial Development Agency (GYEEDA) trial, tried to
distance himself from a cheque he purportedly signed.
“I don’t recollect signing any cheque. I don’t
remember seeing any cheque. The cheque I saw was in respect of GH¢826,153.64
and not this GH¢800,000 cheque before me. How it came about, I don’t know,” Dr.
Shaibu Ahmed Gariba, who until September 2014 was the Director General of Management Development
and Productivity Institute (MDPI) told the court.
Former National Coordinator of National Youth
Employment Programme (NYEP) and NDC MP for Chiana-Paga, Abuga Pele and Philip
Akpeena Assibit, CEO of Goodwill International Group (GIG) are standing trial for
their various roles which the Attorney General’s Department says had cost huge
financial loss to the state.
Dr. Gariba’s position during cross examination by Raymond
Bagnabu, counsel for Assibit that he could not be sure of his signature on a
Zenith Bank cheque brought a sharp argument between the prosecution and
defence.
Marina Appiah Opare, a Principal State Attorney who
led the witness in evidence objected to the tendering of the document on the
grounds that it had no relevance with the subject-matter which is consultancy
services allegedly provided by Assibit for which payment was made.
She said the content on the document related to Oil
& Gas training for NYEP beneficiaries, adding “these are two different
cases here.”
However, Mr. Bagnabu said the witness and Assibit were
joint signatories to the account in question and could not turn around to deny
it adding that the witness had given extensive account of how MDPI and GIG
collaborated on the NYEP projects.
After a back-and-forth argument the trial judge Justice
Afia Asare Botwe admitted the document in evidence saying “the document is
relevant to determine the credibility of the witness.”
When asked by counsel whether it was his evidence
that GIG never prefunded any activity in its relationship with NYEP, the
witness said “I have no evidence his did.”
Pre-financing
of contract
When pressed for the reasons he signed the document
which showed collaboration between MDPI and GIG including prefinancing of
projects, Dr. Gariba said “I signed it without knowing the work they did. If it
was today, I would not sign.”
PW5 told the court that MDPI did not have any direct
contract with NYEP or Ministry of Youth and Sports and insisted that GIG did
not subcontract consultancy services under the Youth Enterprise Development
Project (YEDP) to MDPI.
He also insisted that even if some staff of MDPI
worked with GIG or went on tour in Kenya under the YED project, it was not done
in their official capacity.
“Under the contract between MDPI and GIG, there was
no Tracer Study. We signed for Exit Strategy and this was done on condition
that the $65million will have to arrive first before we could proceed to work.”
Evidence-in-chief
Dr. Gariba who told the court he was a labour
specilist in Canada until his appointment to MDPI in September 2010, said the
institute was a sub-vented organization that helped to build the capacities of
both public and private sector through training apart from offering consultancy
services.
He said initially it was a company called Goodwill
Solutions Associates Africa Limited with an address in Mauritius with Assibit
as the representative that had signed an MoU with MDPI in 2009 to provide
consultancy and other services for that NYEP and other institutions.
He said he got to know from Assibit about the
$65million from the World Bank for the YED project and eventually had a
contract with GIG on the project which was signed on January 17, 2011.
He said the MDPI and NYEP did not have any contract
under the YED project saying “MDPI rendered no service to NYEP under the
contract. I had no knowledge of monies raised in the name of MDPI and I only
got to know about it from EOCO.”
He told the court that Assibit once showed him cheque
of GH¢826,153.64 payable to MDPI/GIGwhich he said “was for prefunding activities
of accessing the World Bank loan and I told him to return it,” saying “I was
scared about it. I hadn’t seen such an amount before. I was told later at EOCO
it was cashed.”
He said the contract was “highly dependent on $65million
coming but since no service was rendered we did not do anything,” adding that
ECO showed him letterheads of MDPI signed by Assibit who did not work with the
institute.
Charges
The
Chiana-Paga MP is facing six counts of wilfully causing financial loss to the
state under Section 179A (3) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 Act 29, two
counts of abetment under Sections 20(1) and 131(1) of the Criminal Offences
Act, 1960 (Act 29) and one count of intentionally misapplying public property,
contrary to Section 1(2) of the Public Property Protection Act, 1977 (SMCD)
140.
Mr. Assibit, who is the first accused person on the
other hand, is facing six counts of defrauding by false pretences, contrary to
Section 131(1) of the Criminal and Offences Act 1960 (Act 29) and five counts
of dishonestly causing loss to public property contrary to Section 2(1) of the
Public Property Protection Act, 1977 (SMCD) 1.
Accused persons
The
accused persons are on trial for the various roles they played, which the
Attorney General’s Department said caused huge financial loss to the state.
The
NDC MP is accused of wilfully causing financial loss to the state to the tune
of GH¢3,330,568.53 while Assibit is being tried for defrauding the state of an
amount equivalent to $1,948,626.68.
The
two have pleaded not guilty and are currently on bail.
No comments:
Post a Comment