“But since he said ten (GH¢10,000) it should be ten” – Justice Ajet
Nassam.
Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By William Yaw Owusu
Thursday, September 10, 2015
The Judicial Council has
reportedly blocked resignation attempts by several judges at the centre of the
bribery scandal that has hit the judiciary, and rather referred them to a
disciplinary committee.
The exposé by investigative
journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas regarding massive corruption in the judiciary has
left some judges scrambling for cover, some of whom are alleged to have dashed
to hospitals for treatment.
Some
of the indicted judges are said to have petitioned the Judicial Council in an
attempt to block the upcoming premiering of the video that contains the
collection of bribes at the Accra International Conference Centre.
The judges had argued that exposing all of them to the public would be damaging to Ghana’s reputation, but the CJ turned down the appeal, giving the green light for the public viewing.
The judges had argued that exposing all of them to the public would be damaging to Ghana’s reputation, but the CJ turned down the appeal, giving the green light for the public viewing.
Mass Suspension
The Judicial Council has
subsequently suspended 22 circuit court judges and magistrates after
examination of the evidence produced by Anas.
A statement issued in Accra
yesterday and signed by the Judicial Secretary, Alex B. Poku-Acheampong, said
the exposé would help the judiciary’s ongoing fight against corruption within
its ranks.
“A Disciplinary Committee of the
Judicial Council was constituted to investigate the petition against the 22
judges and magistrates. It is a five-member committee chaired by a justice of
the Supreme Court and expected to begin its sittings today.
The Committee is also tasked to look out for other
court officials and clerks who may have collaborated in the bribery scandal.
“On September 7, 2015 the
circuit court judges and magistrates were served with letters stating the allegations
against them and asking them to submit their responses by September 9, 2015.
“The Judicial Council further
decided that upon receipt of the responses, the 22 judges and the magistrates
have accordingly been suspended with effect from Thursday, September 10, 2015,”
the statement maintained.
Administration Of Justice
A total of 34 high court, district
and circuit court judges are said to be facing dismissal following the
mind-blowing bribery scandal that has rocked the foundation of the
administration of justice in Ghana.
The high-profile judges have
been captured on either video or audio collecting bribes in order to give
judgements in favour of those who had offered the bribes - and sometimes to the
highest bidder.
It is rumoured that some of the
‘corrupt’ judges even exchanged sex for justice or were given freebies to
pervert the course of justice.
No Way!
Reports say the Judicial Council
and the office of the Chief Justice refused to accept the resignation letter of
Justice John Ajet-Nassam, one of the judges cited in the latest corruption scandal.
However, Justice Ajet-Nassam,
who controversially set free NDC financier Alfred Agbesi Woyome in the GH¢51
million judgement debt debacle, is said to have handed in his official vehicles
and other state accoutrements with him yesterday.
DAILY GUIDE learnt yesterday that the judicial authorities refused the resignations
because they wanted to thoroughly investigate the extent of corruption in the judiciary.
Sudden Illness
Some of the judges implicated in
the scandal have suddenly been taken ill.
Justice Ernest Yaw Obimpeh, one
of the judges allegedly implicated, was said to be currently on admission at an
Accra private hospital while Justice Charles Quist, who jailed then NPP MP for
Bawku Central, Adamu Dramani Sakande, has reportedly suffered mild stroke since
news of the scandal hit the media.
Gory Details
A footage of the incriminatory
video showed money changing hands as one could hear the judges, including Human
Rights Court judges, Justices Kofi Essel Mensah and Charles Quist, allegedly
making demands to throw away cases of robbery, murder and corruption among
others.
“What if I release him (armed
robbery suspect) on Friday and I don’t see you again?” Justice Quist was heard
on tape allegedly quizzing someone.
“Oh I will get him off. I will
get him off the hook on Friday but everything will depend on you,” he stressed
in the conversation.
One of the judges was said to
have taken GH¢5,000 to grant bail to a murder suspect, knowing that the law
doesn’t allow it.
Petitions
Chief Executive Officer of Tiger Eye
Productions Anas Aremeyaw Anas on Monday, August 31, submitted two petitions to
the Chief Justice, Georgina Theodora Wood, over the action of the judges.
A five-member committee was, therefore,
set up on Wednesday, September 2, to look into the matter.
As per recommendations of the committee,
the circuit court judges have been suspended and the fate of the 12 justices of
the superior court will be determined within 48 hours.
The 12 judges have been asked to respond
to the findings made against them.
The findings of the disciplinary committee
also cited more than 100 court officials in the scandal. The video is set to be
premiered at the Accra International Conference Centre on Tuesday, September
22.
All the 180 Judicial Service officials who have been
implicated in the bribery scandal have been interdicted by the Chief Justice,
Georgina Theodora Wood.
The officials
were captured on video ostensibly taking money from litigants.
Some of the culprits have also been linked to sex
scandals in a three-hour edited video emanating from a two-year investigation
into judicial corruption by Anas and his team.
Names of some of the judges making the rounds include
John Ajet-Nasam, Charles Quist (Fast Track), Kofi Essel Mensah (Human Rights),
Paul Uuter Dery (Human Rights) and Mustapha Habib Logoh. They are all high court
judges.
Others are Ivy Heward Mills, Mustapha Mohammed and Obimpeh.
GBA’s Call
Ghana Bar Association (GBA)
spokesperson Tony Forson also said judges involved in the scandal should not be
spared.
“Unfortunately, not all of us have seen this
video; we have just seen snippets…as an association, the decision we have
taken…is that the Constitution makes provisions for the removal of superior
court judges in Article 146; so as a body, we have decided that we will wait
and allow the constitutional provision run its course…in order not to prejudice
any person’s interest because this is a very serious matter,” he said.
He described the scandal as
shocking and worrying, adding that it is an embarrassment to the entire
judicial system.
No comments:
Post a Comment