Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By William Yaw Owusu
Thursday, February 11, 2016
The National Communications
Authority (NCA) has offered to explain the circumstances leading to the award
of a monopoly licence to Afriwave Telecom Ghana Limited to operate the
controversial interconnect clearing house (ICH) for telecom companies, albeit
in a bizarre manner.
The regulator says it was ‘some transpositional
error’ that led to some of the bidders scoring high marks during the assessment
process, but it was later ‘corrected.’
Interestingly, however, the NCA
could not tell the public the actual score after the purported ‘correction’
which made Afriwave win the contract on a silver platter.
IMANI Ghana, a policy analysis
think-tank, believes some interests were being served with the award of the contract
to Afriwave, and has therefore called for its abrogation and a fresh start of
the bidding process.
Over-Voting
In what appears to be an over-voting
reminiscent of the 2012 election petition where over-voting was described as ‘transpositional
error,’ the NCA says a similar thing happened in the bidding process.
A close look at the scores
awarded all the competing companies in three main categories indicate that
Afriwave scored more marks than the maximum awarded.
“The NCA in the preparation of the report,
transposed the scores from Excel to Microsoft Word and noticed that there were
some transpositional errors which were corrected to correspond with the original
Excel scores,” it said in a statement issued yesterday to rebut an
investigative piece done by IMANI Ghana on an alleged fraudulent manipulation
of the bidding process of the ICH.
IMANI is
insisting that the processes leading to the award of a monopoly licence to
Afriwave is riddled with fraud.
“The procedure for getting them (Afriwave) that licence
was fraudulent,” IMANI boss, Franklin Cudjoe, told Joy Fm yesterday.
He believes someone has a vested interest in Afriwave; thus, the
manipulation of figures.
Rigged Process
According to a statement by
IMANI, the Application Evaluations Committee that looked into the capabilities
of five companies that had put in bids to manage the ICH platform rigged the
process in favour of Afriwave.
The companies that
put in bid included Afriwave, Subah Infosolutions, Prodigy International
Limited, TCMS-GVG Consortium Limited and Channel IT Ghana Limited.
The think-tank alleged that the
Albert E. Enninful 8-member panel instituted by the NCA had admitted that they
had insufficient information to make informed judgements about the financials
of most tenders and wondered what informed the total points awarded under debt
and equity.
“The liquidity position of the company was not that strong. On the average, current assets were barely higher than the current liabilities. The working capital was not positive for all three years, 2013 was negative,” the report stated.
The report was received and recommendation accepted by the NCA Board chaired by Eugene Baffoe-Bonnie.
How a company which finances were described as negative by the evaluation panel became the eventual winner is a big question on the lips of observers.
Draft Report
“We are not sure where IMANI got
their information from, and we would like to plead with the general public to
ensure that they get their information from the right sources, in this case
from the NCA,” the authority said in the statement and added that IMANI was
misleading the public by basing its analysis on a ‘draft ‘report.’
Transparent Evaluation
According to the NCA, Afriwave
is a wholly-owned Ghanaian company with Laurisia Associates as its integration
partner, Huawei and Muecci as its technology partners that provided “the most
satisfactory responses against four other competitive applicants.”
It said that there was “a comprehensive
and transparent evaluation of the bids of the five applicants on 23rd January,
2015,” and the NCA Board of Directors “considered the evaluation report and the
recommendations contained therein and endorsed the said recommendations,”
adding, “the Board duly adjudged Afriwave Ghana Limited as the winner of the
Clearing House licence.”
No comments:
Post a Comment