Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
Angry! Mrs Betty Mould Iddrisu with her lawyers at a news conference
By
William Yaw Owusu
Accra, Wednesday September 16, 2012.
FORMER ATTORNEY-GENERAL, Betty Mould-Idrissu is on
warpath with some personalities and media outlets for allegedly defaming her.
According to Mrs. Mould-Idrissu who was also a
former Minister of Education, 16 defendants published or circulated articles
purporting that she had bought three houses in the UK, a claim she deems
libelous.
She has therefore filed a suit at an Accra Fast
Track High Court asking for aggravated damages of GH¢ 2,000,000 and an order to
restrain the defendants from further publishing “falsehood” about her.
The suit filed by her
solicitors Chris King Esq. of Heward Mills and Co. on Thursday September 20,
cites Ken Ofori Atta and Keli Gadzepko as owners of The Statesman Newspaper as well as Asare Otchere-Darko
–Editor-in-chief, Frank Agyei-Twum – Editor, and Annaliza Agyare – General
Manager, all of The Statesman Newspaper and the newspaper itself.
Also, the Alliance
for Accountable Governance (AFAG), Abu Ramadan – Director of Operations of
AFAG, DAILY GUIDE, Ghana Web
and Francis Akoto are all cited.
The rest are: Robert
Bellart, OMG Ghana, BiGX Group LLC, Kwadwo Ofori-Mensah and a certain Paa
Kwesi.
In her statement of
claim, Mrs. Mould-Idrissu who averred that she is a lawyer of “international
repute” said that on June 12, 2012, the Ghanaweb
published that “Ex-Minister buys 3 Houses in the UK” and that article was
referring to her.
According to the
plaintiff “this article was sourced to a fictitious and non-existent newspaper
as part as the mischievous and malicious intent by the defendants to defame the
plaintiff and smear her reputation.”
Mrs. Mould-Idrissu
said that in their natural and ordinary meaning the words meant and were
understood to mean that she had stolen monies belonging to Ghana and “surreptitiously
deposited them in a bank account in the UK.”
She said the
publications also meant that “the plaintiff had bought 3 houses through ill
gotten monies and fraudulent means. Plaintiff had dealings with one Dr. Kumar
as part of a ploy to siphon ill gotten monies. Plaintiff had been involved in
conduct igniting investigations from a British Serious Organised Crime Agency.”
“The allegations made
by the defendant in the said article are wholly false and without any
justification whatsoever,” Mrs. Idrissu fumed.
According to the
statement of claim the plaintiff in denial of the allegations caused her lawyer
Nana Ato Dadzie to issue a rebuttal but in spite of the rebuttal, the
defendants “in defiance and deviance of
same caused further defamatory words to be published I aggravation of the
already caused to and sustained by the plaintiff’s reputation.”
To prove a point,
Mrs. Mould-Idrissu averred that on Saturday June 16, 2012, Kwame Okoampa-Ahoofe
Jr. Ph.D caused to be published on Ghanaweb
an article titled: “Nana Ato Dadzie is a liability for Betty Mould.”
She claimed that the
article in their natural and ordinary meaning were understood to mean that “The
plaintiff had stolen Ghanaian taxpayer’s monies and stashed illicit monies
abroad.”
The plaintiff further
claimed that on June 13, 2012 the Statesman newspaper that published that she
had bought three houses in different locations in the UK as well as deposited
1.042 million pounds in her Barclays Bank UK private account between November
2011 and May 2012 and in the said article, AFAG and its Operations Director Abu
Ramadan had called for a probe into the matter.
“In their natural and
ordinary meaning the words meant and were understood to mean that the plaintiff
as a high ranking political figure in high office of the government of Ghana
had unlawfully amassed wealth and inputedly embezzled state funds.”
The claim said “The plaintiff aggrieved by
these ill motivated and malicious lies caused her lawyer to carry out an
official search of the land registry in England and Wales on the properties
that the false publications alleged she had purchased. The search proves that
there is not an iota of truth or justification in the malicious and false
publications by the defendants.”
The plaintiff said
she neither owns nor operates a Barclays Bank account in the UK or elsewhere as
alleged and said the publication was “false and malicious.”
“The publication of
the words complained of have gravely injured the reputation of the plaintiff,
has exposed her to public scandal and contempt and caused her embarrassment and
distress.”
She also said by
reason of the said publication by the defendants she had been “severely injured
in her personal and international professional reputation and standing in the
international professional legal and governance community.”
“By of the
publications and the consequent loss of reputation in the international
professional legal and political community, the plaintiff has lost
opportunities and her future professional prospects have been diminished.”
Apart from damages
and restraining order sought, the plaintiff is also asking for costs, interest
on the damages awarded at the prevailing bank rate of judgement till date of
final payment as well as any other reliefs or order that the court the court
might deem fit.
The defendants are
yet to respond to the suit but it is interesting to note that even though DAILY
GUIDE was cited in the suit, there was nowhere in the averments of Mrs.
Mould-Idrissu that the paper was mentioned.
No comments:
Post a Comment