Mohammed Alhassan - Acting IGP
Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By William Yaw Owusu
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Detective Inspector James Atta was an active
investigator until 2006 when he was dismissed by the police administration for
no reasonable cause.
He proceeded to court to protest the unjustifiable
treatment meted out to him but after obtaining a judgement from an Accra High
Court (Labour Division) for reinstatement, the Ghana Police Service blatantly
refused to comply with the court’s order.
Narrating his ordeal to DAILY GUIDE, Inspector
Atta, who was almost in tears, said he was attached to the Greater Accra
Regional Criminal Investigations Department (RCID) when in 2006, a stealing
case was referred to him for investigation.
He said the stealing case involved one Wisdom Donkor
but after only three weeks a directive from the CID Headquarters came through
to him that he should hand over the case to them because the complainant had
petitioned the IGP which he did.
“One afternoon in 2006, I received directive from
the CID headquarters that I should hand over a case I was investigating to
another officer which I did immediately.”
“I handed over the case docket to Sergeants Tetteh
and Aggrey, all of the Rapid Response Unit (RRU) for investigations to continue.”
He told DAILY GUIDE that “I also handed over
the exhibits involved that were kept in the exhibit store room.”
He recollected that the suspect was tried at Accra
Circuit Court 8 and convicted before the court ordered that the complainant
should be given back the stolen items, which happened to be the exhibits.
According to Inspector Atta, the complainant came
for the exhibits in his presence, and they (investigators and the storekeeper),
opened the store but the exhibits were missing from the custody of the police.
He said he later got to know that the exhibits were
auctioned at a time he travelled to his hometown to bury his twin brother.
“After three days, I was marched to the IGP’s office
where he (IGP) told me that he had wanted to remove me from the service but
because another superior officer intervened, I should expect my interdiction
letter.”
He said after another three days he was interdicted
and for one-and-half years he did not hear anything from the police administration
on service enquiry.
Fed up with the attitude of his employers, Inspector
Atta said he proceeded to court to seek justice but in the course of the
proceedings, the IGP again sent for him and told him that he (IGP) had received
the full facts of the matter and that he should submit himself for Departmental
Trial.
He told DAILY GUIDE that at the Departmental
Trial, one ASP Ayambilla was selected to hear the matter but he (officer) was
bias towards him (Atta) and that compelled him to return to court.
He said for instance that at the Departmental Trial
he told them that he had witnesses who knew about the exhibits but ASP
Ayambilla did not allow him to bring in those witnesses.
Apart from the IGP, Inspector Atta cited the Police
Council, Minister of the Interior and the Attorney-General in the suit.
In the judgement delivered by Justice Kwabena Asuman-Adu,
the court held that even though the interdiction of Inspector Atta was not
unlawful, “his subsequent dismissal from the Police Service based on the
service enquiry was wrongful.”
The court ordered the plaintiff’s reinstatement as
Inspector and promoted in accordance with his service conditions.
“It is ordered that the defendants pay to the
plaintiff, his entitlements including allowances from the time of his
interdiction till date,” and also awarded GH¢ 5,000 cost in favour of the
plaintiff.
No comments:
Post a Comment