Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By William Yaw Owusu
Tuesday, July 22, 2014
The much-touted trial of the former National
Coordinator of National Youth Employment Programme (NYEP) and Philip Akpeena
Assibit has been adjourned until October 6, 2014.
The case could not proceed as scheduled
yesterday because the prosecution failed to produce a witness in court.
This is not the first time the prosecution had
asked for more time in the case; even before the cross-examination of Mohammed
Pelpuo, head of the Business Development Unit at NYEP who is the PW3, was
concluded.
Principal State Attorney, Evelyn
Keelson, told the packed Financial Court presided over by Justice Afia
Asare-Botwe that the intended witness was engaged in another assignment.
“We were supposed to call our next witness
but unfortunately, he is engaged in another assignment,” she explained.
She said the witness’ notice to the AG’s
Department was “so short” that the prosecution was unable to get a replacement.
Uncharacteristic of a criminal trial, the court
had no option but to grant a long adjournment, taking into consideration the
impending legal vacation which commences in August and ends in October.
Accused Persons
Incumbent
Member of Parliament (MP) for Chiana-Paga, Abuga Pele and Philip Akpeena
Assibit, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of Goodwill International Group (GIG)
are standing trial for the various roles they played, which the Attorney
General’s Department said caused huge financial loss to the state.
Until
last year, Abuga Pele was the National Coordinator of National Youth Employment
Programme (NYEP), now the GYEEDA.
He
is accused of wilfully causing financial loss to the state to the tune of
GH¢3,330,568.53 while Assibit is being tried for defrauding the state of an
amount equivalent to $1,948,626.68.
The
two have pleaded not guilty and are currently on bail.
Charges
The
NDC MP is facing six counts of wilfully causing financial loss to the state
under Section 179A (3) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960 Act 29, two counts of
abetment under Sections 20(1) and 131(1) of the Criminal Offences Act, 1960
(Act 29) and one count of intentionally misapplying public property, contrary
to Section 1(2) of the Public Property Protection Act, 1977 (SMCD) 140.
Mr.
Assibit, who is the first accused person on the other hand, is facing six
counts of defrauding by false pretences, contrary to Section 131(1) of the
Criminal and Offences Act 1960 (Act 29) and five counts of dishonestly causing
loss to public property contrary to Section 2(1) of the Public Property
Protection Act, 1977 (SMCD) 140.
Fresh Request
Immediately
the case was adjourned, Raymond Bagnabu, counsel for Assibit asked the court to
order the Economic and Organized Crime Office (EOCO) to release his client’s
vehicles for them.
“Even
though we have satisfied the bail conditions, EOCO is keeping my client’s
vehicles. We have complained severally but they don’t seem to hear our case.”
The
judge asked counsel to do the formal thing by filing an application saying “you
know what to do...don’t come with an oral application.”
No comments:
Post a Comment