Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By
William Yaw Owusu
Tuesday, July 1, 2014
The Ghana National Petroleum Corporation
(GNPC) says it does not have the court proceedings that preceded the sale of the
Discoverer 511 Drill Ship.
The proceedings formed part of the
processes leading to the controversial disposal of the state asset.
The
sale
Ghana Government in 2001 sold the GNPC’s
Drill Ship at $24million to service several debts owed by the stated-owned oil
company following a series of failed agreements entered into in the 1990s.
Out of the amount received from the
sale of the state asset, $19.5million was said to have been paid to Societe
Generale as judgment debt secured against GNPC in a London Court in 1999.
The
Drill Ship was bought by a Norwegian businessman and his wife and they changed
the name to ‘Frontier Discoverer’ in Dubai, United Arab Emirates after it had
been intercepted in Muscat, Oman in the gulf region.
Testimony
Adwoa Afriyie Wiafe, Principal Legal
Officer at the GNPC appearing before the Commission of Enquiry investigating
the payments of judgement debts told Sole-Commissioner Justice Yaw Apau of the
Court of Appeal that “We don’t have in our possession, the proceedings of the
case.”
She said the GNPC had made it clear at
their last appearance at the commission that the Attorney General (AG) took
over the case and the Corporation was no longer involved.
“We were of the opinion that perhaps the
AG who was involved in the case would be the proper person to provide the
proceedings but since the commission wants us to produce it we will contact the
court to get them.”
Dometi Kofi Sorkpor, counsel for the
commission then suggested to the GNPC representative that even though the AG
represented, the GNPC was a party to the suit but the witness insisted “it was
the AG who took over the case and we were not involved in the proceedings.”
“When they took over we ceased to be
part of the case. We were a party at the time the AG took over. Our supervisory
ministry (Ministry of Energy) informed us about the outcome of the case and we
considered that as sufficient evidence of what had taken place.”
Ex-Parte
Judgement
Justice Apau then cut in to say “The case was GNPC’s
case and the AG wrote to dispense off the services of their lawyers and said
they were going to take over the defense of the suit but they didn’t. The AG
did not go to the UK.”
“They didn’t defend it that was why the judgement
was ex-parte. As an ex-parte judgement,
since it affects the corporation, you have to apply for copy of the proceedings
and the judgement that followed for records purposes.”
“The AG’s office at that time truncated the GNPC’s
defense and counterclaim so the commission would like to know what happened in
the judgment that was entered,” the judge said.
Head of Treasury Department at the Bank of Ghana,
Yao Agbelenko Abalo also tendered in evidence exchange rate of the major
foreign currencies from January 1991 to January 2014.
A partner of Ernst and Young, Victor Gboglah told
the commission that he audited CP’s account from 2000 to 2012 and said Owusu
& Fiadjoe had audited company’s account from 1991 to 1995 after which
Fiadjoe & Associates did it from 1996 to 1999.
No comments:
Post a Comment