Posted on: www.dailyguideghana.com
By
William Yaw Owusu
Wednesday, July 30 , 2014
The Ministry of Finance and Economic
Planning (MoFEP) says it cannot be held liable for any wrongful payment of
compensation to victims of the Volta Basin Flooded Area.
“The ministry would like to comment that
we rely on the verification and processes done by the MDAs and statutory bodies
that have been mandated to review the processes,” Sarah Fafa Kpodo, a senior
state attorney at the ministry told the Commission of Enquiry investigating the
payment of judgement debts.
At the commission’s sitting in Accra
yesterday, Sole Commissioner Justice Yaw Apau asked the MoFEP to comment on a report
by a professional group that was tasked to look into the Volta Basin
resettlement programme.
The group investigated the entirety of
the resettlement programme including payment of compensation after the Akosombo
Dam was constructed over the Volta River and areas including Pai, Apaso,
Makango, Kete Krachi among others were mentioned.
However, the MoFEP Attorney said “the
ministry in its role does not approve of claims. What the ministry does is that
they accept claims already approved either by sector ministries or the
agencies.”
She continued that “in this case it is
the Ministry of Lands and Natural Resources through the Land Valuation Division
of the Lands Commission. If it is already approved at that stage, it is
forwarded to the ministry for payment.”
She said “we normally receive a
verification reports and in this situation we received one from the SFO
spelling out that all the statutory provisions have been complied with.
Ms Kpodo said there were three reports
in all and two were dated August 2006 in respect of the Makongo flooded area,
and the Apaso flooded area adding “the one dated September 2006 is the
investigation into the compensation claims which included the Pai flooded area.
I believe to the best of my knowledge that the third report actually
consolidated the previous reports.”
“The report raises very significant
issues. It raises the issue of how the acreages for which the compensations
were paid. It raises the issue of the bonafide of the consultant who worked on
them. It also raises the issue of the formula for which the payments were
made,” she said.
“The ministry’s audit division has been
mentioned in the report as not being diligent. With that issue, the auditor who
worked on the documentation had been transferred and a new officer has taken
over and is going through the processes to respond to the commission’s
questions.”
She said the ministry was compiling data
to respond appropriately to the commission’s request for information on all
issued concerning the Volta Development Act (Act 46) of 1967 under which the
VRA operates, State Lands Act (Act 25) of 1962 under which the VRA acquired the
lands, Article 267 of the 1992 Constitution which states the mode for which
state lands are acquired.
She also promised the ministry’s commitment
to help the commission to unravel the payment of GH¢460,000 to the Worawora
Chief as land compensation for the Volta River flooded area.
She said she was not aware if the amount
paid to the Worawora Chief was compensation for 3000 acres of deluded land that
had been seeded by the Pai Traditional Council to the Worawora Council.
It emerged at the commission that the
schedule attached to the payment of the first installment did not show any
deduction of the 3000 acres from the 99000 acres credited to the Pai Traditional
Council resulting in double payment and it is the contention of the commission
that it escape audit scrutiny of MOFEP.
Ms. Kpodo said the ministry has September
2013, established a Compensation Unit where new claims that come to the
ministry were supposed to be routed through the unit, adding that “the ministry
does verification of all documents before ordering payments.”
No comments:
Post a Comment