Wednesday, May 11, 2016

SACK TERKPER! BAWUMIA BARKS OVER DIVERTED $250M CASH

By William Yaw Owusu
Wednesday, May 11, 2016

The New Patriotic Party (NPP) vice presidential candidate for the November general election is calling on the Finance Minister, Seth Terkper, to resign following his illegal diversion of $250 million into a private bank in flagrant breach of the law.

Dr Bawumia has asked for a parliamentary inquiry into the circumstances leading to the transfer of the $250 million of proceeds from Ghana’s $1 billion Eurobond to a private bank.

However, the finance minister has since parried the resignation call over the dodgy transaction, saying he had not broken any law.

The Eurobond was borrowed at an all-high interest rate of 10.75% but the $250 million ended up at UBA which in turn used the funds to purchase treasury bills by lending to government at an interest rate of more than 20%.

Dr Bawumia broke the news when he delivered a public lecture at the Accra Polytechnic on “Youth Unemployment: Causes and Solutions” last Friday and said the transaction should be reversed without delay.

He said that “The funds were ostensibly transferred to or ‘placed’ at UBA on behalf of the Ghana Infrastructure Investment Fund (GIIF). The instruction to the Bank of Ghana for the transfer of these funds came from the Ministry of Finance, headed by Terkper.”

Terkper Adamant
However, the finance minister, even though conceded that the money had been transferred from the Bank of Ghana account, the ministry had not breached the bank’s regulations and went ahead to justify the transaction as a normal practice, saying that public funds did not only reside in the Bank of Ghana and that they are all accounted for as part of public funds.

According to the minister, Section 5 of the GIIF Act provides for sources of money for the Fund, which include a portion of the ABFA from the oil revenue and moneys raised and borrowed from the capital market, adding that the Bond proceeds were given as seed money to the GIIF.

He added that “the Fund was mandated to invest in, purchase and realise any investment of any kind and is not to be comingled with government funds,” saying that the Fund was set up as a sovereign wealth Fund and is statutory just like DACF, GETFund and NHIA, and is by law operationally independent.

Bawumia Sad
“The minister of finance responded to my allegation. The minister’s response basically confirmed what I had revealed. There is no denial that the $250 million was placed at UBA and secondly, there is no denial that the funds were also used to purchase treasury bills. Unfortunately, the minister of finance however sought to defend this transaction as normal practice,” Dr Bawumia said yesterday in a follow-up statement to the minister’s Monday press conference.
He said, “The response of the minister in terms of the arguments he has advanced to defend this transaction saddens me. It confirms to me that those in charge of managing our finances do not really know what they are doing.”

He said emphatically that the transaction was in violation of Section 53 of the Bank of Ghana Act 2002 (Act 612) which relates to the holding of state foreign exchange.

Bank Of Ghana Act
The erudite economist said, “It should be noted that under the law, the foreign exchange that was deposited at the UBA belongs to the state and should be part of Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves.

“By moving the foreign exchange to UBA, the transaction takes the funds out of Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves. What the minister has done, contrary to the law, is to outsource the management of Ghana’s foreign exchange reserves (which is the preserve of the Bank of Ghana) to a private bank.”

 “The minister also mentioned the DACF, NHIA and GETFund as examples of statutory funds like GIIF. At the same time he claims the GIIF is a sovereign wealth fund. This is basically comparing apples with oranges.
The proper comparison should have been with the Petroleum Fund which is kept at the Bank of Ghana under the Petroleum Revenue Management Act, consistent with the Bank of Ghana Act.”

Reckless Debt Management
He said the government had been reckless in the management of national resources, wondering, “How do you go and borrow money for 10.75% (US dollar) and give it to someone to lend it to you at over 20% (GH¢)?” adding, “in effect you are paying over 30%.
“Assuming stable exchange rates, Ghana will be paying additional interest of at least $50 million a year on this transaction. It is really reckless.”

Idle Funds
Dr Bawumia said the government’s claim that the funds were idle was untenable, asking, “Why do you borrow funds and pay interest on it if you do not have use for them at the moment?

“It is clear that the GIIF does not have a portfolio of projects ready to invest in and it is weird to allocate a whopping sum of $250 million to them at this time. Is the minister aware that the country owes N-Gas some $100 million? What about other contractors who are owed money by the government? How can you owe so much, have so much to do and yet claim to have ‘idle’ borrowed funds?”

Lack Of Reading
Dr Bawumia reiterated his position that NDC government officials do not appear to read before making statements, saying, “First of all, if the minister had taken his time to read the Bank of Ghana Act (unless he is pretending not to have read it), he would have found out that this transaction is in violation of the BoG Act.”

More Agitation
Some business and financial analysts have labelled the transaction as a fraud being perpetrated on Ghanaians by the NDC government.

“It is clearly create, loot and share on another level. The annual interest rate the $250m illegally lodged inside that Nigerian bank (UBA) will be $50m, which is 20% of the principal; and this is not going to the BoG,” one analyst said.

Another expert remarked, “This was a common scam in Nigeria, which the EFCC is now ordering the banks to pay the interests accrued to the Federal Bank.  The NDC government has brought this 419 to Ghana.”

No Parliamentary Approval
The transaction does not appear to have passed through Parliament for approval as required, making many conclude that $50m was to be siphoned before putting the principal back at the central bank.

 “This was supposed to be a neat scam, with a cool $50m chop to be creamed off. This is what Ghanaians must know,” another analyst noted.


No comments: